Decision Maker: Cabinet
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Is subject to call in?: No
The Portfolio Holder introduced the report which highlighted some of Ashford’s activity
during 2018/19 to improve the health and wellbeing of its residents. It also highlighted
changes made in approach and the new priorities for delivery during 2019/20 and
onwards. The report also sought to amend Ashford’s constitution in order to enable
effective partnership working at the Ashford Health and Wellbeing Partnership. She
advised that the health and wellbeing of residents was a key priority of this
Administration and the development of the Council’s new Corporate Plan and to achieve
their goals, working with partners would be crucial. She wanted to thank those who had
worked in this area over the last year from the Council and, in particular, from partner
organisations both locally and sub-regionally. The new Ashford Health and Wellbeing
Partnership would focus on three key priority areas: - working together to ensure there
was a fit for purpose health infrastructure in Ashford; continuing to be the vanguard of
innovation - building on Ashford’s fantastic One You model; and tackling health
inequalities in the Borough.
The Portfolio Holder said it was worth drawing particular attention to One You –
Ashford’s flagship response to health and wellbeing issues in the Borough. This
continued to go from strength to strength, so much so that it had had to move premises
much earlier than originally thought and she was delighted to announce that the new
One You shop would be opening at the beginning of July. This would be a fantastic new
community facility – free to access and for all to take advantage of. It would include an
increased number of consultation rooms, kitchen facilities, practical learning, and
exercise space and a family area, as well as a changing places toilet. This was all made
possible by the financial investment of the last Administration and she encouraged
everybody to visit and make use of the wide range of services delivered at the shop.
In accordance with Procedure Rule 9.3 Mr Crompton, a local resident, had requested to
speak on this item. He advised that he wanted to discuss the wellbeing of the most
vulnerable sector of society – disabled and vulnerable people. Officers and Members
would be aware that he had previously raised the issue of disabled adaptations to
housing and Disabled Facilities Grants (DFGs). He referred to examples at other Local
Authorities where this had not been dealt with properly and that Council had been forced
to pay appellants compensation for discrimination and disadvantage suffered. This
Council also had its own alternative process in place for dealing with Council tenants,
and this placed it at risk of also being at odds with the statutory entitlement through
Disabled Facilities Grants. He considered such problems would not exist if the Council
treated people equally. He referred to an issue he had previously raised with the Council
and not received a response to in that people had statutory entitlements. In 1990
mandatory grants were introduced by the Government, and DFG was the last one to
remain mandatory. All an individual had to do was make a valid application and it
became a statutory requirement, it was not a case of the Council having to cut other
budgets as he had previously been advised. If people did not meet their statutory
obligation of paying their Council Tax, the Council would prosecute and take them to
court, so he considered disabled people should not treat this Council any differently if
their applications were not honoured. In his view this was all about the Council treating
people fairly and honouring their pledges to Council tenants, without forcing them to
move because they could not have their homes adapted. Case law was very clear that
“Local Housing Authorities were not entitled to take resources in to account in deciding
whether or not approve a DFG for Section 23 purposes”. He also pointed to the
Council’s policy of removing adaptions that they deemed no longer necessary and
wondered where that left disabled residents?
The Leader said that when he took his position six years ago he had made it clear to the
Housing department that adaptations to houses for disabled people was a high priority
for him and he was less interested in renewing kitchens at regular intervals and would
rather concentrate on the needs of disabled people in those homes. He had charged the
Head of Housing to remedy that and reduce that waiting list, including both Council
tenants and the general public. They had even funded an additional Occupational
Therapist to assist KCC in removing a bottleneck and getting that backlog down.
The Head of Housing confirmed the Leader’s comments and clarified that Housing
Services had done a lot of work in this area. At that time, the waiting list was standing at
around a 2/3 year wait for DFGs and a similar level or longer in certain cases for
disabled adaptations to Council properties. They had also been asked to “level the
playing field” regardless of whether they were from Council tenants or private
individuals. Both the Council and the HRA invested more money into addressing those
needs and she was pleased to say that they had reduced the position with most people
now waiting for a period of 6/9 months from start to finish of the process and there was
currently no-one on the DFG waiting list. It was also worth pointing out that the Council
would not remove an adaptation that was still required by a disabled person. It may have
to be replaced by an alternative if its useful life had ceased, but it would not be removed.
She hoped this therefore demonstrated that the Council had significantly improved the
situation and whilst there were financial rules around the funding for such adaptations
through different channels, in her view the most important thing was that a Housing
Authority actually delivered, and that is what this Authority had been doing. Both the
Head of Housing and the new Portfolio Holder for Housing offered to meet Mr Crompton
outside of the meeting to discuss this particular matter further if he so wished.
The Head of Community Safety and Wellbeing said that on the substance of the report,
it was important to note that there was a massive work stream that the Council and
partners would be undertaking on a wide range of health and wellbeing issues and she
encouraged all Members to get involved and engaged in this agenda. She wanted to
thank partners for the amazing amount of work they undertook to support this
programme.
The Leader said he wanted to re-iterate that one of his highest priorities was to disabled
and vulnerable people and to be a caring Authority. This Council had introduced a
number of measures such as: - assisted waste collections; the Syrian refugee
programme where Ashford had taken the most refugees in the country per head of
population; dementia and autism friendly film screenings at the new cinema; and
working closely with the Ashford Access Group including now inviting them to be a
member of the Ashford Strategic Delivery Board.
Resolved:
That
(i) the achievements made by the Ashford Health and Wellbeing Board
in 2018/19 be noted.
(ii) the work undertaken by partners in 2018/19 to improve Ashford’s
response to local, sub-regional and regional health and wellbeing
issues be noted and that this hadresulted in the establishment of the
Ashford Health and Wellbeing Partnership (AHWP) and the East Kent
Health Improvement Partnership (EKHIP).
(iii) authority be delegated to the Head of Community Safety and
Wellbeing to act as the Council’s representative on the AHWP and the
EKHIP, subject to consultation with the Portfolio Holder for
Community Safety and Wellbeing as required. Decisions are likely to
be around the priorities of the Groups, as well as activities to deliver
them.
(iv) the action plans to deliver the priorities of the AHWP, and the fact
that there may be future resource implications in delivery, be noted.
Contact: Angela d'Urso Email: angela.durso@ashford.gov.uk.
Publication date: 21/06/2019
Date of decision: 13/06/2019